The young man who reads no fiction strikes back

Below, after the links to my chastisement, are my young friend’s response to my stern words on him not reading fiction.

https://richardswsmith.wordpress.com/2016/12/31/stern-words-for-a-young-man-who-reads-no-fiction/

https://richardswsmith.wordpress.com/2017/01/01/two-more-reasons-why-my-young-friend-must-read-fiction/

He can now be revealed as Gergely Stewart, and you will, I’m sure, that his response is spiritited if misguided. I will be back with my response.

An English friend who is highly intelligent, lives in London, and has travelled widely tells me that he reads 45 mins of fiction every morning, and that to ignore such literature is to make a serious, even stupid mistake. I have not read any fiction in the past 12 months. He tells me he is appalled.

Firstly, I am honestly quite thrilled that he has taken a take-no-prisoners approach to slapping me down, publicly no less through the posting of his blog on social media, that most whitewashed forms of communication, where most people spend their time advertising the outside of their lives whilst never revealing anything much from their inside. How refreshing.

Secondly, it’s true, my statement to him in defending my lack of story reading was pretty appalling. “Fiction is a cop-out on dealing with the real world”. The milllions, perhaps billions of hours enjoyed globally every year snuggled up behind a good, fictional book are all hours well spent, and even better spent when you consider how most people spend most of their spare hours. For one, as a childhood fanatic of Roald Dahl, I fully prescribe to his call against The Box:

“So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,

Go throw your TV set away,

And in its place you can install

A lovely bookshelf on the wall.”

However, whether to his relief or to his dread, it wasn’t a statement designed to provoke just for the sake of provoking, and here’s why.

Rule number 1 – life is short, potentially too short for fiction (or for very much of it).

Life Is Short. I try to live by this rule. If you die tomorrow regretting how you spent your time today, then you’re wasting your precious life.

The question is what to do with that precious time, once you’ve fed and clothed yourself, provided a roof over your head, and spent the time you need and want to spend with your close ones. What to do with the remaining “me” time.

My first reason for not giving any space in those hours to reading fiction is because essentially it is a form of escapism that I already get (and more) through non-fiction. Life is quite simply too short, the hours I have purely to myself too few, to lose it to fictional escapism.

For non-fiction has a trump card, as it is both knowledge and pleasure, in fact pleasure through knowledge. Not the deceptive knowledge of thinking you understand human kind through reaching into the heart of a Dostoevsky character. But actual, practical, touchable and applicable knowledge of how humans are of have been, how they behave, what drives them, how they build their world, and how our world is built, that offers lessons on a daily basis about the contemporary reality around us.

Nonsense, I can hear him say. Fiction is much more than pure escapism. The pleasure of reading fiction also comes from it being “best and perhaps the only way to experience another world.” Yet, without once stepping out of the non-fiction section of the bookstore, in the last twelve months I’ve have been to Ecuador with Alexander Von Humboldt, Persia under Cyrus the Great, Mexico with Cortes, the Pacific islands with Magellan. These were books written not for professional, academic readership, which I agree can mind-sapingly dry, but for those desperately hungry to experience another world through colourful and enriching prose.

Indeed, life is so short that I find walking through bookshops painful for the knowing that I’ll never be able to read everything good on every part of history worth reading about. How can I give up my precious time to someone else’s fantasy, when I’ll never even have a chance of reading about all the wondrous civilisations, the real peoples, of the past?

Rule number 2 – the truth is not in fiction, it’s in yourself.

My friend believes that fiction is by far the best way to understand people, “real people,” relationships, and essentials like love and death. Which is true, in an ephemeral, intellectual sort of way. I hope he doesn’t believe it can be put to any actual practical use.

Indeed I’d go so far to say that it doesn’t matter how much fiction a person reads, they will never truly understand people, relationships, love and so on unless they focus on the science – on the non-fiction world – of psychology, and first and foremost on themselves, their own psychology, their own mind. Understanding how they react to people and situations around themselves, why they feel they way they feel, and how they can help themselves to work with their inner mind to then be better able to work with everything around them, can only be achieved through hours spent in discussion with someone else who understands how psychology works.

I’ve met many well-read people who seem utterly lost in the world of people, and a few who have almost no interest in reading but have a profound understanding of themselves and their environment due to their intense interest in psychology as a practical application.

Rule number 3 – I realise that pride comes before a fool.

I can hear my friend’s mind whirring already with his original counter arguments. How can you ignore the pure pleasure of fiction, the deep, soul enriching satisfaction that comes from reading great literature, because it’s not somehow as practical or “real?” “The stories are mostly a means to an end not an end in themselves,” he says. On this, he is of course right. Sometimes, the journey is more important than the destination.

For this reason and indeed for his last, that for “even the smallest aspiration to write as well as you can then you need to read and read,” I would also happily accept his prescription of a regular diet of fiction (poetry will have to come later; that will prove I fear a far greater challenge), especially if I am able to replace TV/football watching time (both of which I already do far too much of) with the stories of the imagination.

He insists that I change, and I reply that I will try to spend more time reading fiction for pleasure and leisure. But for my part I insist that he re-evaluates the true-life value of the fictional word. Happiness and fulfilment, “pleasure of the most lasting kind,” begins in one’s self.

https://richardswsmith.wordpress.com/…/stern-words-for-a-y…/

https://richardswsmith.wordpress.com/…/two-more-reasons-wh…/

 

Advertisements

One thought on “The young man who reads no fiction strikes back

  1. Pingback: Agreeing with some points from the young man who reads no fiction but attempting to correcting some fallacies | Richard Smith's non-medical blogs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s